Greetings world, We are Anonymous.
Millions of people use Google every single day, to search for anything and everything. News articles, t shirts, and even illegal downloads of their favorite television shows. Google is the most widely used search engine in the United States and Europe and still has a widespread hold across global search. Search engines and much of the internet are based on the principle that the more people care about, search for, or visit something it’ll rise to the top of the search results and be seen by more people. Popular search engines have an auto complete function so as you type something it’s attempting to answer your question for you before you even finish, and we assume that the results and recommendations offered by that auto complete are things that people have actually been searching for.
When you put 79 divided by 5 into Google it’s always 15.8, when you ask how do you make pizza dough you’re going to get a bunch of recipes of how to make pizza dough. Because of that principle there is an inherent trust that when you search for something on Google, you are seeing the actual factual answer to your query or question based at least in part in the result to what other people are actually searching for.
In the case of Hillary Clinton who clinched the democratic nomination, we know for a fact that is not the case. Google has been actively altering search recommendations in favor of Hillary Clinton’s campaign. When we type in “hillary clinton cri” in to Google, the sites auto complete function shows three potential searches: “hillary clinton crime reform”, “hillary clinton crisis”, and “hillary clinton crime bill 1994”.
However, when you type the same term, “hillary clinton cri” into Google’s competitors Bing & Yahoo, you get VERY different results. Focusing on whether or not Hillary Clinton has ever committed a crime. There is clearly something wrong here with Google’s results, right? So what’s going on here? Maybe people are just searching different things on Google then on Yahoo or Bing… wrong. When we check for “hillary clinton crime reform”, the top result from Google earlier. There aren’t even enough searches of the term “hillary clinton crime reform” to build a graph on the site. Which begs the question, why on the earth is it the first potential result on Google? For comparison we added a second term, “hillary clinton crimes”, Look what Google gave back. Apparently far more people are searching for “hillary clinton crimes” then “hillary clinton crime reform”. Google just doesn’t want you to know or ask on their search engine.
But maybe we’re still wrong, we tried it again, this time to see if Hillary Clinton’s much discussed potential indictment by the FBI would show up. When you type “hillary clinton ind” into Bing or Yahoo, there are plenty of indictment based results. When you type it into Google the top two recommended results are “hillary clinton indiana” and “hillary clinton india”. Could people really be searching more for “hillary clinton india” then “hillary clinton indictment”?
When we check both “hillary clinton india” and “hillary clinton indictment” graphs we can see people are searching for “hillary clinton indictment”, 8% more often then “hillary clinton india”. The intention is clear, Google is burying potential searches for terms that could of hurt Hillary Clinton in the primary elections in the past several months by manipulating search results on their site. In addition we searched for negative terms that have been associated with Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump, on all three sites. Google matches both Bing & Yahoo for “donald trump rac” showing the top two results “donald trump racist speeches” and “donald trump racist news”. No visible tampering.
Google’s bias here is undeniable but how did this happen, why? Who is responsible. There are a stunning number of links between Google and Hillary Clinton’s campaign and they all stem to one person, Eric Schmidt, the executive chairman of Google’s parent company Alphabet inc. And former CEO of Google is a major funder of “The Ground Work”, which is, according to sources, An investment by Schmidt to insure Hillary Clinton has the technological and engineering crowds to win the election. The Ground Work’s specialty is data analytics and targeted out reach…
That’s what we have for now, search everyone for information arm yourselves, let’s start over look at the facts.
We are anonymous.
We are legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Anonymous – Google manipulating Hillary Clinton search results